Renewable Energy's Environmental Paradox
Wind and Solar Projects May Carry Costs for Wildlife
By Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson
Thursday, April 16, 2009
|
A proposed power line that would transmit solar and wind
energy from New Mexico to Arizona would run next to wildlife
habitats including the Bosque de Apache National Wildlife
Refuge, home to sandhill cranes. (By Sandy Seth --
Friends Of the Bosque Del Apache Via Associated Press) |
The SunZia transmission line that would link sun and
wind power from central New Mexico with cities in Arizona is just the
sort of energy project an environmentalist could love -- or hate. And it
is just the sort of line the Interior Department has been tasked with
promoting -- or guarding against.
If built, the 460-mile line would carry about 3,000
megawatts of power, enough to avoid the need for a handful of coal-fired
plants and to help utilities meet mandated targets for use of renewable
fuel. "We have to connect the sun of the deserts and the winds of the
plains to places where people live," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said
recently.
But the line would also cross grasslands, skirt two
national wildlife refuges and traverse the Rio Grande, all habitat areas
rich in wildlife. The graceful sandhill crane, for example, makes its
winter home in the wetlands of New Mexico's Bosque del Apache National
Wildlife Refuge, right next to the path of the proposed power line. And
much of the area falls under the protection of the Interior Department's
Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Renewable-energy development, which the Obama
administration has made a priority, is posing conflicts between economic
interests and environmental concerns, not entirely unlike the way
offshore oil and gas development pits economics against environment. But
because of concerns about climate, many environmentalists and government
agencies could find themselves straddling both sides, especially in
Western states where the federal government is a major landowner.
"Everybody in New Mexico loves the sandhill cranes,"
said Ned Farquhar, a former aide to New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (D).
"We also love our renewable energy. So we have to figure this out."
Farquhar made that comment a month ago when he was
working for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Since then, he has
been appointed head of the BLM -- in charge of figuring it out.
As the push for renewable-energy development
intensifies across the United States, scientists and activists have
begun to voice concern that policymakers have underestimated the
environmental impact of projects that are otherwise "green."
"There is no free lunch when it comes to meeting our
energy needs," said Johanna Wald, a senior lawyer at the Natural
Resources Defense Council. She added, however, that the renewables boom
"offers a chance to do it right."
"We want to do it differently compared to how we did
oil and gas development," she said.
There is no question that permit applications for
renewable-energy projects are on the rise, especially on federal land in
the West. According to Ray Brady, leader of the BLM's energy policy
team, the bureau has received 199 applications for solar projects
encompassing 1.7 million acres of land, though only two of them have
undergone environmental assessments.
The agency has already authorized 206 wind projects
-- 28 of them to generate power, the rest primarily to test a region's
wind-generation capacity -- and at least 200 more are awaiting
approval.
The fact that eight Western states have established
"renewable portfolio standards" has accelerated the push for new
projects, Brady said, because those policies are forcing utilities to
find additional renewable sources of electricity.
"For all of these reasons, BLM does have a challenge
because of the additional work involved," said Brady, who predicted that
the agency may hire as many as 100 people just to work on
renewable-energy permits. "Clearly there's an interest in expediting and
streamlining the process. However, we need to make the right decisions
that are based on the best science."
One of the biggest challenges renewable-energy
projects pose is that they often take up much more land than
conventional sources, such as coal-fired power plants. A team of
scientists, several of whom work for the Nature Conservancy, has written
a paper that will appear in the journal PLoS One showing that it can
take 300 times as much land to produce a given amount of energy from soy
biodiesel as from a nuclear power plant. Regardless of the climate
policy the nation adopts, the paper predicts that by 2030, energy
production will occupy an additional 79,537 square miles of land.
The impact will be "substantial," said Jimmie
Powell, the Nature Conservancy's national energy leader and one of the
paper's co-authors. "It's important to know where the footprint is going
to be."
In some cases, scientists are just beginning to
discover the unintended effect of projects such as wind turbines.
Grassland birds such as the lesser prairie chicken and the greater sage
grouse, both of which are candidates for listing under the Endangered
Species Act, appear to avoid vertical structures such as wind turbines
and transmission-line towers. This is proving to be a problem in states
such as Kansas, an ideal site for wind power, because as more turbines
are built, lesser prairie chickens will confine themselves to narrow
ranges, fragmenting a population that must be connected to survive.
"Nobody knows what's in the bird's head, but
presumably there's an inherited behavior that allows the birds to avoid
avian predators who could perch overhead," said Michael Bean, wildlife
director for the Environmental Defense Fund, an advocacy group.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed
requiring that developers keep wind turbines at least five miles away
from a prairie grouse lek, or mating area, but the wind industry has
resisted this idea.
Ditlev Engel, president and chief executive of the
Danish wind-energy company Vestas, said anecdotal evidence about birds
being caught in turbine blades and other environmental horror stories do
not usually hold up under scrutiny.
"Do people think it's better all those birds are
breathing CO2? I'm not a scientist, but I doubt it," said Engel, whose
company is expanding its U.S. manufacturing and distribution operations.
"Let's get the facts on the table and not the feelings. The fact is,
these are not issues."
In many instances, producers of renewable energy are
coordinating with environmental groups and federal agencies to try to
map out the best locations for energy production, whether in the West or
offshore. The Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Audubon
Society have created an online mapping project, using Google Earth, of
13 Western states to show where renewable projects would have the most
impact. Out of the 860 million acres in those states, for example, there
are 10,000 conservation areas, and 128 million acres are off limits to
energy development.
In the case of SunZia, the company has been working
to minimize the impact of its proposed transmission line. Tom Wray,
manager of generation and transmission projects, said that as much as 80
percent of the line's path would parallel existing lines. He said that
it would cross the Rio Grande north of the sandhill crane's flyway and
that it would zig and zag to skirt environmentally sensitive areas.
Every mile added to the length of the line, however, would add about $1
million to the project.
"We're not aware of any threatened or endangered
species habitat or impact issues that we can't mitigate or deal with,"
Wray said.
Lawrence A. Selzer, president of the Conservation
Fund, said the new administration is eager to advance these projects
without alienating environmentalists. "The answer from President Obama
can't be no," he said. "They've got to find a way to say yes."