Breaking News
Get 4 extra free issues and unlimited free access to NewScientist.com
New Scientist is now partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service

 

Cloning pioneer asks to retract landmark study

  • 17:58 16 December 2005
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Shaoni Bhattacharya
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Robot toy

Strict robots

Robot tells human off when he makes a mistake as they construct an object
 
Magpie in the mirror

Mirrored magpie

Movie Camera
Magpies recognise their own reflection, throwing current brain theory into doubt
 
Polygamy benefits

Polygamy benefits

Want to live longer? The key for men is to have lots of wives and many children
 
Crashed spacecraft

Crash test

Movie Camera
Images of a failed parachute test for NASA's Orion crew capsule are not as bad for the project as they look
 
Gorilla

Animals and death

Gorillas and other animals appear to grieve - but do they understand death?
 

Once dubbed South Korea’s ‘king of cloning’, Woo Suk Hwang and his colleagues have requested the retraction of a landmark stem cell paper they published in a June 2005 edition of the journal Science. But he stands by the veracity of his findings in the face of a flurry of accusations that he fabricated the results.

The paper (Science, vol 308, p 1777), which outlines groundbreaking stem cell research in which 11 human embryonic stem cell lines were created specifically for patients, has become increasingly mired in controversy.

On Friday, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which publishes Science confirmed that it had received Hwang’s request before a press briefing he gave earlier in the day.

Science editorial received direct communication, by telephone, from Hwang and Dr Gerald Schatten, the lead authors of the 2005 paper. They said they wish to retract the paper,” says a statement from AAAS. All authors must agree to a retraction, it adds. “Dr Hwang has assured us that he is contacting his co-authors.”

Science editorial continues to follow and encourage the official investigations now underway and will withhold comment on them until the investigations have been completed,” it says.

Data fabrication claims

Hwang's news conference in Seoul was in response to allegations of fabrication of data by colleague and co-author Sung Il Roh, at MizMedi Hospital, Seoul, circulating in the Korean media on Thursday.

“What I can say clearly is that we have produced patient-specific stem cells and we have the technology to do so,” Hwang maintained. The importance of the work, which claimed to have created 11 stem cell lines specific to each of 11 different patients, is that it showed stem cell therapies could be tailored to individuals, avoiding the immune rejection problems that usually hamper tissue transplants.

On Thursday, Roh reportedly told Korean media: “Of the 11 stem cell lines, at least nine are faked and the veracity of two others has yet to be confirmed.”

But Hwang says that of the original 11 stem cell lines, six died because of contamination and five others were frozen. He says these are being thawed and that he will validate his findings by testing them within 10 days. But he did admit “irretrievable mistakes in the photography” which accompanied the study.

He told Science last week that the paper contains four instances in which the same photographs were mistakenly used to represent cells cloned from different patients.

Questions have also been raised about the DNA fingerprint plots in the paper. This technique was used to verify the identity of the cloned cells – to show that the DNA in their nuclei matched the DNA of the original cells taken from the patients.

Cell mix-up

Speaking at a separate press conference on Friday, after Hwang had spoken, Roh said another researcher and co-author, Sun Jong Kim, then at MizMedi Hospital, told him that the results were fabricated and that Hwang and his colleague Sung Keun Kang, also at Seoul National University, ordered Kim to fake them, according to South Korean newspaper The Chosun Ilbo.

Hwang says the discrepancies in the documentation supporting his paper are probably due to a mix-up between the team’s stem cells and stem cells stored at MizMedi Hospital.

"I believe that one of my collaborators, who had access to both the laboratory at Seoul National University and the MizMedi Hospital, switched the stem cell lines,” said Hwang, according to The Korea Times. However, Roh denied the allegations, saying that he never authorised the provision of stem cell samples to Hwang’s research team.

But Kim, who is now at the University of Pennsylvania, US, defended the research on Friday and denied any falsification. He told KBS news that he had personally seen eight stem cell lines and another three being nurtured. "The stem cells were cultivated through normal procedures, and eight members of Hwang's research team verified them every morning," he said.

Ethical rules

The scandal surrounding Hwang’s work blew up in earnest in early November over allegations that the eggs of junior researchers on his team were used for the research. International ethical rules forbid the use of eggs from junior colleagues to avoid the possibility of coercion.

Hwang, based at Seoul National University, eventually admitted this was true, apologised and resigned from his official posts on 24 November. But then allegations that Hwang had fabricated results began to surface in the South Korean media.

Leading researchers told New Scientist that they wanted independent testing of Hwang’s results. And the team’s one US co-author, Gerald Schatten at the University of Pittsburgh, had already asked for his name to be taken off the paper.

Hwang’s team were also the first in the world to derive a human embryonic stem cell line from a cloned human embryo (Science March, vol 303, p 1669). And in August 2005, the team announced the first successful cloning of a dog.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There is 1 comment on 1 page

By Keaundra Gooding

Wed May 14 19:28:16 BST 2008

It was Good information

REPORT | REPLY

There is 1 comment on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

 
 
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine